Home > 13.10 > Is Ubuntu 13.10 vulnerable to CVE-2015-7547

Is Ubuntu 13.10 vulnerable to CVE-2015-7547

October 12Hits:2

Is Ubuntu 13.10 vulnerable to CVE-2015-7547?

From the references, i could see its not affected, however i want to double check on this.


Related Articles

  • Is Ubuntu 13.10 vulnerable to CVE-2015-7547October 12

    Is Ubuntu 13.10 vulnerable to CVE-2015-7547? From the references, i could see its not affected, however i want to double check on this. http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2900-1/

  • Is Apache vulnerable to CVE-2015-1781?May 4

    Is Apache vulnerable to CVE-2015-1781 (buffer overflow in the gethostbyname_r() family of functions)? How can I quickly check if a system of mine is secure? --------------Solutions------------- You must check the version of your glibc first: using th

  • glibc getaddrinfo (CVE-2015-7547) vulnerability: should I update glibc if I do not configure DNS?February 17

    Recently Googly discover glibc getaddrinfo (CVE-2015-7547) vulnerability: https://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.co.il/2016/02/cve-2015-7547-glibc-getaddrinfo-stack.html We run our application on CentOS 6. I found here the following: https://rhn.redha

  • CVE-2015-7547: glibc getaddrinfo stack-based buffer overflowFebruary 17

    https://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/cve-2015-7547-glibc-getaddrinfo-stack.html If I have an OpenWRT with default install, do I need to update, if we only count the threat from WAN/Internet side?

  • Ubuntu 12.04, PCI, and CVE-2015-5352July 23

    PCI compliance will fail when the CVE-2015-5352 vulnerability is present. OpenSSH 6.9 fixes this vulnerability, but none of the supported versions of Ubuntu (12.04, 14.04, 15.04 and 15.10) have been patched. What is the best way to address this vulne

  • What is CVE-2015-1793? Does it affect me?July 9

    Apparently a new bug has been discovered in OpenSSL, it is being called as Alternative chains certificate forgery (CVE-2015-1793). Canonical already declared the versions of openssl that are not affected with currently supported releases. I am using

  • Ghost Vulnerability - CVE-2015-0235January 28

    Does the Ghost Vulnerability require access (as in being a logged in user) to the effected OS in question? Can someone clarify the 'remote attacker that is able to make an application call'? I only seem to find tests to run on the local system direct

  • Patching GHOST Vulnerability # CVE-2015-0235 SLES 11 SP3February 2

    I need to upgrade a SLES 11 SP3 server for the new ghost vulnerability that has been discovered. According to http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/cve-2015-0235-patch-ghost-on-debian-ubuntu-fedora-centos-rhel-linux/ I should be able to run zypper although th

  • OpenSSL vulnerability CVE-2015-0205January 26

    I can't seem to make any sense out of the following vulnerability in OpenSSL: DH client certificates accepted without verification [Server] (CVE-2015-0205) ============================================================================= Severity: Low An

  • How can the Android GraphicBuffer::unflatten() vulnerability (CVE-2015-1474) be exploited remotely?May 18

    I've been reading up-on DoS (denial-of-service) attacks within android and although I understand attacks like the below, which make use of regular programming functions etc. (Android Web Browser) When an Android Device visits a particular webpage, th

  • Could the causes of CVE-2015-2502 vulnerability be common to Firefox and Chrome?August 21

    On Tuesday August 18, 2015, Microsoft published an advisory pointing out a 0-day vulnerability (CVE-2015-2502) that can be exploited by an attacker to perform a remote code execution on Internet Explorer (from version 7 to 11, even if you are running

  • How to patch CVE-2015-0235 (GHOST) on Debian Lenny and Squeeze?January 28

    There is a right way to patch GHOST on Debian Lenny and Squeeze? According to this link there are no plans to patch Lenny https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-0235 Thanks! --------------Solutions------------- Note, that you must have

  • How to mitigate CVE-2015-1130 (Hidden Backdoor with Root) due to lack of Apple support?April 10

    This is related to CVE-2015-1130, a.k.a Hidden backdoor API to root privileges in Apple OS X. It appears Apple has refused to fix it in OS X 10.9 and earlier. Emil Kvarnhammar, the one who reported this vulnerability to Apple states: Apple indicated

  • MySQL BACKRONYM (CVE-2015-3152) only affects MySQL client?May 26

    I read the CVE-2015-3152 (https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3152) named BACKRONYM (http://backronym.fail/), and what I understood (ELI5 style) was the following: Attacker sniffs the network looking for packages from a MySQL clie

  • Firefox CVE-2015-4495August 7

    I recently read that there was a major vulnerability fixed in Firefox: CVE-2015-4495 Which would have affected Linux as well, as there is a PDF viewer for this version, however would it affect you if you weren't using the PDF viewer? Is it only a PDF

  • What are the mitigating factors for CVE-2015-5364?August 10

    CVE-2015-5364 describes a UDP based DoS vulnerability in the Linux kernel that can be used to deny processing cycles to the host operating system and its applications. https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5364 A flaw was found in the way t

  • is there a workaround for CVE-2015-2625?October 27

    we are not able to upgrade jdk 6 to jdk1.8u51 where this issue (CVE-2015-2625) is fixed. is there a workaround one can have until we migrate to jdk1.8? --------------Solutions------------- You ask for a workaround for "Unspecified vulnerability...all

  • Can CVE-2015-7704 - ntpd kiss-of-death affect NTP time servers or just clients?October 30

    As the ntp.conf file on a linux server can be setup to allow the system to act as both a client to the public servers and a time server source for local systems am I correct in assuming that it (the "server") also needs the updated ntpd package?

  • Can CVE-2015-4852 be exploited against WebLogic servers after a load balancer?November 13

    I have Java applications served by Oracle WebLogic servers that are after a load balancer. The WebLogic t3 protocol (vulnerable) is not tunneled to the WebLogic servers, only the HTTP requests. In this scenario, can my Java applications server by the

  • How to add an account when Thunderbird warns "potentially vulnerable to CVE-2009-3555"?June 26

    I just updated to Thunderbird 3.1 and now when I attempt to add in a new email account for one of my domains I get mail.server.example potentially vulnerable to CVE-2009-3555. Now reading up on it here I have done the given settings that are in the c

Copyright (C) 2018 ceus-now.com, All Rights Reserved. webmaster#ceus-now.com 14 q. 0.659 s.